Research reveals that large language models (LLMs) and humans exhibit similar patterns of reasoning, challenging the notion that human reasoning is inherently more principled and abstract. A study comparing human participants with 25 LLMs found that both entities rely on pattern matching to make decisions, often leading to similar errors and failures in generalization1. This discovery suggests that the distinction between human and artificial intelligence is not as clear-cut as previously thought. The findings have significant implications for the development and evaluation of AI systems, as they highlight the need for more nuanced understanding of human reasoning and its limitations. Furthermore, this research underscores the importance of considering the potential consequences of AI advancements on policy, security, and workforce dynamics. The fact that LLMs and humans share similar reasoning mechanisms matters to practitioners because it underscores the need for a more informed approach to AI development and deployment.